Ottawa will need other ways to cut emissions to compensate for oil pipeline: Farrell

• Share on Facebook
• Share on Bluesky
• Share on X
• Copy Link

“And of course, Canada, through its various greenhouse gas strategies, will have to find a way to reduce that by 2050, given our goals for 2050.”

ongoing investigation

Shoe with severed foot inside found on Nanaimo's shores in May

1h ago

fatal incident

Teenage dirt biker killed in south Nanaimo collision

3h ago

todo list

Cut tax, reduce deficit, grow economy. Can B.C. Conservatives do it all at once?

5h ago

An analysis by Environment Canada, submitted to the committee and provided to The Canadian Press, projected the emission reductions from Pathways at 22 million tonnes a year.

Environment Canada also estimated that transporting an extra million barrels of oil a day through the new pipeline would increase emissions by 27.7 million tonnes.

To meet its 2030 target under the Paris Agreement, Canada still needs to reduce emissions by 227 million tonnes annually, based on the latest estimates from 2024.

One million tonnes is equivalent to what is emitted by 233,000 passenger vehicles over a year.

In July, Ottawa and Alberta signed an agreement with five of Canada’s major oil companies to advance the Pathways project.

The agreement made the Pacific Link pipeline conditional on getting Pathways built.

Asked by MPs on Wednesday what would happen if the oil companies suddenly reversed course and decided not to build it, Farrell said the major projects office could bake it into the conditions document for the pipeline.

“If Pathways wasn’t going to be underway, it would have to be a condition in our mind of the final conditions document that the Pathways project would be built in order for the (pipeline) to go ahead,” Farrell said.

“That’s what that conditions space is for.”

Manitoba Conservative MP Branden Leslie pressed Farrell over the fact that the conditions document issued by the major projects office is only a recommendation and the federal cabinet has the final say.

“Does cabinet have a veto on those conditions ultimately?” Leslie asked.

“You can make that as a recommendation. (But) can cabinet say, ‘No, in fact, never mind. We don’t need to build the pathways project. Go ahead with the pipeline’?”

“Well given that the Prime Minister is the one who’s very determined to have Pathways, I’m not sure why that would happen,” Farrell replied.

“But certainly cabinet, it’s at their discretion. They make the decision.”

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Oct. 28, 2026.

— With files from Lauren Krugel in Calgary

Nick Murray, The Canadian Press