STAY CONNECTED: Have the stories that matter most delivered every night to your email inbox. Subscribe to our daily local news wrap.

What happens next in Florida airport shooting legal case?

Jan 9, 2017 | 5:00 AM

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — Esteban Santiago, the former Army soldier held in the mass killing inside the Fort Lauderdale airport, was told Monday that he could face a death sentence.

The 26-year-old Iraq war veteran from Anchorage, Alaska, was ordered held on charges including committing violence against people at an international airport resulting in death, and with two firearms offences. Santiago’s hearing Monday was only the beginning of what will likely be a lengthy journey through the federal court system following the shooting, which killed five people and wounded six others at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport.

Here is where things stand:

____

WHAT HAPPENED AT THE FIRST HEARING?

U.S. Magistrate Judge Alicia Valle asked if Santiago understands that he could face death if convicted of the charges, and questioned him about his finances before appointing the federal public defender’s office to represent him at taxpayer expense. Santiago spoke in clear voice, telling the judge he had about $5 to $10 in the bank. He remains in federal custody and Valle set a detention hearing for Jan. 17 and an arraignment for Jan. 23.

_____

HOW LIKELY IS THE DEATH PENALTY?

Although the charges carry a potential death sentence, the Justice Department will decide later whether to pursue that penalty assuming Santiago is convicted. Many other issues can come into play, such as whether he decides to plead guilty or go to trial. Guilty pleas usually do not result in death sentences. The airport violence charge allows a sentencing judge wide latitude in deciding how many years behind bars he might serve, all the way up to life in prison, if the death penalty is off the table.

_____

DOES SANTIAGO HAVE A Defence?

Uphill at best. There are dozens of witnesses to the shooting and the FBI said in an affidavit that he told agents in a post-arrest interview how he planned the attack, what weapon he brought with him to Florida, how he loaded the gun from his checked luggage in an airport bathroom and came out firing. There is also video surveillance of the shooting that shows the shooting and its aftermath. Santiago was arrested after running out of ammunition and lying spread-eagle on the floor until a deputy took him in to custody, his 9mm handgun nearby.

_____

WHAT ABOUT MENTAL ISSUES?

Santiago’s attorney can ask for a mental competency evaluation to determine if he is fit to stand trial. It’s a fairly high standard for any defendant to escape criminal charges because of mental problems because many defendants understand the difference between right and wrong. The main issue for the court is whether a defendant is too impaired to assist in his own defence. Most defendants who go this route are ultimately judged fit for trial and the mental health issue becomes a major factor at sentencing.

_____

WILL STATE PROSECUTORS FILE CHARGES?

They could. So far the case against Santiago is proceeding in the federal system. Theoretically the state could charge Santiago with five counts of first-degree murder — again punishable by death — as well as multiple counts of attempted murder and many other charges. Broward County’s chief prosecutor, Michael Satz, so far has not indicated one way or another if he will pursue a separate case. Because of several Supreme Court rulings, Florida’s death penalty system is currently in limbo.

_____

IF TERRORISM LINKS ARE FOUND, THEN WHAT?

Federal prosecutors could obtain a new grand jury indictment charging Santiago with terror-related offences, either adding them to the existing charges or substituting them. So far, FBI agents have said they have uncovered no evidence linking Santiago to international terrorism. He told agents in Alaska that government mind-control was forcing him to watch Islamic State terror videos.

Curt Anderson, The Associated Press