STAY CONNECTED: Have the stories that matter most delivered every night to your email inbox. Subscribe to our daily local news wrap.

Police arrest Ottawa man who allegedly fled to avoid testifying at murder trial

Dec 28, 2016 | 12:00 PM

OTTAWA — A man who allegedly fled Ottawa to avoid testifying at a murder trial has been arrested by police after landing at the city’s airport.

Police say Ali Abdul Hussein was arrested on Tuesday after arriving in Ottawa from a foreign country.

Hussein has been charged with failing to appear as a witness and obstructing justice in connection with the trial of Nawaf Al-Enzi, who was charged with the 2006 murder of Mohamed Zalal, an Ottawa-area drug dealer.

Const. Chuck Benoit says Al-Enzi, who was Abdul Hussein’s brother-in-law, was found guilty earlier this month after a second trial in the matter.

Police say a second man, 32-year-old Mahmoud Kayem, is still being sought for the same charges faced by Hussein.

According to a 2014 ruling from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, Al-Enzi, Abdul Hussein and Kayem were initially all charged in 2008 with Zalal’s murder.

The appeal court ruling said Abdul-Hussein made a deal with the Crown and gave a statement to police in which he said Al-Enzi shot Zalal in a car driven by Kayem. Abdul-Hussein also pleaded guilty to accessory after the fact, for which he received a statement of time served.

The ruling said the Crown then proceeded jointly against Al-Enzi and Kayem, charging each with first-degree murder. The ruling said both Al-Enzi and Kayem pleaded not guilty and blamed the other.

Midway through their trial, Abdul-Hussein recanted his statement to police, the ruling said. He was then cross-examined in court but Al-Enzi’s lawyer withdrew from the case partway through the process, leaving Al-Enzi unrepresented, the ruling said.

The trial judge adjourned the case for nearly four months for Al-Enzi to find a new lawyer but the man wasn’t able to and sought a severance or mistrial so he could be represented by counsel at a new trial, the appeal court ruling said.

But the trial judge decided the trial should proceed, the appeal court ruling said.

Kayem was acquitted and Al-Enzi was convicted, but then appealed his conviction arguing that the trial judge’s refusal to grant a severance or mistrial caused a miscarriage of justice, the appeal court said.

The appeal court agreed with Al-Enzi’s argument, set aside his conviction and ordered a new trial, which ended with a guilty verdict earlier this month.

According to the Crown at Al-Enzi’s first trial, Zalal was allegedly murdered over a dispute about a handgun, the appeal court ruling said.

The gun allegedly belonged to Zalal but while he was in jail he loaned it to Al-Enzi, the ruling said. Zalal demanded the gun back when he was released but Al-Enzi allegedly did not want to return it, according to the Crown’s position summarized in the appeal court ruling.

— By Diana Mehta in Toronto

The Canadian Press